Learnings from the Karnataka - Mumbai Ranji Trophy final 2010 concluded 14th January
1. Even when chasing a championship record score in the fourth innings, after some studying of the pitch, attack in the middle overs (Pandey, Joshi), especially with the middle order is already out there batting. But remember, the more suitable conditions are the prime requisite so in the event that they haven't resulted yet and, say, you've lost wickets and your middle order is already out there batting, hang on. Just because they are better batsmen than your lower middle or lower order, there's no point in making them commit harakiri. Although Mumbai's top batsmen in either innings cannot be complimented for putting on substantial runs, they cannot be blamed because they did not throw away their wickets with ambitious shots. This control typified the team's approach and the lower order came good in both innings.
What's good with this method: It's better than trudging along in the battle of attrition while defending your wicket dourly, and getting singles with the odd boundary every 6 or 8 overs blah blah. Remember though, the latter is the approach to take in less than optimum conditions, typically with the top order or tailenders batting on a difficult pitch.
Why: Wickets will fall even while defending and playing discrimate shots on the merit of the ball. Get your runs before your own wickets fall and more ideal conditions for the bowling team result, for e.g. the new ball being claimed on a lively pitch, or crumbling wicket (4th of 5th day) turning ideal for big spin while the ball is old. (You might even say Abhishek Nayar did the right thing in Mumbai's 2nd innings by trying to create an aerial boundary, although that didn't work)
2. Look for the safe aerial route in attacking in the semi-optimum conditions (Pandey, Joshi): This upsets fielding plans and bowler brains apart from adding runs.
Mind you: You mustn't make the aerial route a must and must carpet drive where runs and boundaries will come. The aerial route is an option especially against spinners because of the mental destruction it causes to the bowlers. Remember, if you don't follow that tenet, you're doing exactly what the bowling side wants - baiting yourself as if you're playing their benefit match.
3. Talk to yourself as if commentating, when under pressure (Abhishek Nayar): The footage will show Nayar talking to himself at the batting crease in a pressure situation of 50 for 5, almost like he was a retard, except that he was exactly the opposite - bold. And innovative. Remember, outside pressure apart, we create our own and compound it. Talking to oneself (because you don't have to sound logical) is one brilliant way of warding it.
4. Have bowling conferences when you badly need a wicket (Jaffer with Abdulla): Even if you're discussing nothing, the batsman thinks you are and is distracted by the thought that something is afoot.
5. If you have a bowler whose in-swing and out-swing actions have very little difference in visual cues to the batsman (Mithun), make his ideal line (on a lively wicket) outside rather than on or around off stump. And also delivering from wider at the bowling crease.
Why: Batsmen will have to play at an outside off stump ball (which they'd normally be at liberty to leave) not knowing if it's the inswinger or outswinger. For the ocassional outswinger when the bat is beaten, the batsman's chances of playing away from the body increase and in direct proportion does the risk of the ball catching his edge.
6. Always anticipate a third-day-onward decline in pitch liveliness and set chasing targets for the opposition accordingly.
What happened: Everybody seemed to have been convinced after watching days 1 and 2 that the pitch was helpful for the bowlers. Had Mumbai anticipated or planned for its slowness when Karnataka was to chase on Day 3 and 4, their urgency to add more runs through Nayar and Kulkarni would have been more evident to the respective batsmen. These two had done a match-saving job but Mumbai experienced Day 4's morning session when Pandey and Satish showed how it was possible to get easy runs without getting threatened. The Mumbai team would have hoped for an extended effort from their own batting pair instead of the slight show of abandon when they lost their respective wickets.
Friday, January 15, 2010
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Mumbai Prevail
Day 4 (match concluded) Ranji Trophy final 2010, Karnataka Vs Mumbai
By Vikram Afzulpurkar
Master moves/plays by Karnataka in order of priority and (usually) more recent first because of context of playing in pressure and deliver time.
- G Satish's batting of fibre (70 odd) in the final chase
- Manish Pandey's 150 at nearly a run a ball
- Karnataka's strategy of attacking before the second new ball would become due for Mumbai (2nd innings)
- Joshi's attacking even after the new ball was taken (he was smart to realise that staying only invites pressure and fatality, which can be neutralized by picking the right ball to hit, that to over the fielders, again highly frustrating them
- Mithun's superlative bowling in both innings and the threat he posed at all times
- Dhawal Kulkarni's wickets of Stuart Binny and Vinay Kumar in the second innings
- Sunil Joshi's dismissal through a regulation caught behind (second innings)
- Iqbal Abdulla's being brought on to bowl left-arm orthodox and equally Wasim Jaffer's conferences with him (video replays of the match will show a startling regularity between those and the fall of a Karnataka wicket in the second innings. Whether it was the actual conversation or the time-out causing a break in rythm to the batsman is only known to the Mumbai team)
- Avishkar Salvi's three wickets in the first innings. Remember these were three top batsmen and at a time when wickets were needed. The low Karnataka first innings score of 130 is largely owed to this, because of which, don't forget, the eventual target of 338 got created for Karnataka
- Not matching Mumbai enough in judgement outside the off stump when batting, which would have saved a few batsmen or delayed their fall. That element of Mumbai fibre helped their team feel they had a mighty weapon and imposed on their opponents in a way not possible to word.
- Their dropped catches and importantly non-alertness to half chances. In contrast, Mumbai latched on to everything and seemed to have been unable to convert just one half chance (Jaffer), not withstanding Rahane's 'almost dropped the world cup, son' dying moments effort, which unfortunately for him qualifies more as a full chance because it was the title-snatcher, and the famous Pandey spill by keeper Samant.
- Amit Verma's dubious dismissal (not their fault)
Mumbai's forgettable moves/moments were:
- Assuming like the rest that 338 would be safe enough a target to defend. Shouldn't they remember that in the last, and title, match of the season, the rivals would pull out all stops and strategise towards it. After all, don't forget what the last decade taught us - even 433 can be chased in 50 overs in international cricket.
- Semi related to the above point is the fact that they suspected but did not urgently press the case that the pitch would in fact slow down on day 3. If they did, then some strategising perhaps in imploring Abhishek Nayar never to go over the top (in the second innings) and pleading with Dhawal batting to leave the good new ball outside the off stump, might have been the order of the day. After all, the way these two had salvaged operations, it seems a better manner of dismissal (we all have to meet that fate eventually) might have been more deserved. Not to mention that it would likely have added runs... but wait... there's more...frustrated the Karnataka fielders and bowlers into more loose balls even.
- Keeper Samant dropping Pandey early in his innings
1. I'd like to touch upon some above mentioned points because they may just become 'one in the list' - Joshi's batting (2nd) actually got Karnataka closer to the title although the spectators will harp on his lame dismissal. Upto the point that the old ball was in operation, it seemed to be the team decision, spearheaded in execution by Pandey no doubt, to attack it before its time ran out. But once the new ball was claimed, it would have seemed the commonsense thing to play out normally. That is where Joshi was smarter than the rest (unless his camp was on the same page with him), and a case in point is his own dismissal - that hanging around only makes the Mumbai team sniff wickets and in the battle of attrition, a wicket falls (unfortunately before too many runs are added). He went over the top even against the new ball, unsettling fielders and bowlers with timely boundaries and helped ease the pressure. A good performance from an elder statesman.
2. G Satish's name has been prioritized above Pandey's above. Reasons: Pandey would not have been able to play his strokes without Satish's type of batting for support. Pandey is a different brand of player and is expected to dish out a role the way he did. Satish, however, has not enjoyed a similar kind of confidence state-wide and therefore played out of his skin. Pandey's own knock was slightly above the expected going by his own high standards and supported by the team strategy. So 150 runs off just as many balls is something to marvel at when compared to the other individual scores and the strike rates in this match, but must not be quoted out of context, given the license to execute. Three cheers for Satish.
3. Some guys assume a larger than life figure and Mithun, because of his knack for taking top-order wickets posed a different threat for Mumbai's batsmen who probably played him differently and were put in a shell even though wickets were not necessarily falling later. His open action and line just outside off stump combine to make batsmen play the ball for fear that it may be the inswinger. And of course we all know that the chances of the batsmen to edge are better when they play away from the body, which would be the more likely case whenever they were playing Mithun. This contrasts to regular-action bowlers from both sides whose side on actions require a more pronounced twisting outswing body-action decipherable by the batsman who are therefore not necessarily committed to playing at the resulting ball. Also many of the others pitched their outswingers on or around, not that it is a sin, off stump,allowing the batsmen to play close to the body when they did, therefore minimizing the threat of the edge.
Peach deliveries at crunch time
Mumbai's adoring thousands who watched the match on TV must have likened Dhawal Kulkarni's two match-turning strikes of Stuart Binny and Vinay Kumar to those that Pakistan's Wasim Akram facilitated in their World Cup final of '92 (Sorry, that comparison is a must again). Again, both were bowled, one a batsman (Stuart vis a vis Allan Lamb) threatening to take the game away and falling to a superbly crafted delivery with opened up the right hander. The other an all-rounder (Vinay Kumar vis a vis Chris Lewis) who failed to read the extent of the inswing. Both the dimissals in either game came at a time when the bowling team was not exactly sniffing a wicket but quite in contrast when the batting team looked relatively settled and recovered.
Karnataka take the day's honours
Anyway, recovering from superlatives, one must size up the day's proceedings - Pandey and Satish smashed and milked the Mumbai bowling respectively to helplessness to raise an eventual and unimaginable 200 run stand, a sight unfortunately denied to many television viewers because of a network breakdown. Pandey fell just before lunch and when it looked like at least alternate wicket stands would trickle down the required runs to an achievable score, which it did, the Mumbai pace bowlers epecially kept coming out out with something special. Certainly, if deservedness needs to be attributed to a Mumbai victory it would have be for Dhawal Kulkarni's clean-bowling reasonably good batsmen, bowling the new ball even without the support of a full slip cordon - Binny's and Vinay's dismissals.
Bowling masterpieces
Dhawal's were superbly hand-crafted deliveries because in either case the batsman was not slogging but was beaten all ends up. Amit Verma can consider himself really unlucky to be given out caught behind by umpire Saheba when the ball had in fact hit his pad as he attempted to flick away Abdulla's spin. This highlights an important point of referral and the use of technology to minimize human error. There was no referral in this instance but the replays clearly showed a huge gap between bad and ball. This dismissal, like when Abdulla schemed Pandey's caught-at-slip earlier was preceded by a captain-bowler conference, one of them pre-over, the other mid-over. So, there's the trick - call a conference even if you're talking about your holiday in Spain! Well, Warne and Healy in '95 spoke of exactly these things before holding up Basit Ali from 3 minutes to bowl him with the last ball of the day. No strategy there except to upset the rythm.
Sticking to commonsense
In the dying moments, Karnataka, as a strategy chose not to nominate a strike-hogger (who would protect the lesser batsman), probably rightly so, as they needed every run. Well, just to deviate, in the famous Twenty20 2007 final lost to India, Pakistan, probably the batsman himself, Misbah decided not to run singles or run runs which would expose the weaker batsman, that too when balls were at a premium. History had to freeze there to analyze if this would become a trend. Anyway, the Karnataka batsmen cast that theory aside (which eventually Karnataka cynics might deliberate after Arvind's evidenced vulnerability) probably because Vinay as a batsman was only slightly better than Arvind and every run was precious. Karnataka then garnered as many singles from either batsmen, initially Arvind and Vinay and afterwards the former and Mithun. Unfortunately Arvind, who'd a couple of minutes earlier cut one just above head level to Rahane at point for a spilled chance (maybe a three-quarter chance) fell to the experienced Agarkar's - attempting to turn away the ball past leg, the deviation did him in and he returned an easy leading edge to the ecstatic bowler.
Agarkar came into the match
Agarkar in a way got his way, symbolically clinching the last wicket and also being the leading wicket taker in the second innings for Mumbai with a tally of five. His aggro with the Karnataka team, starting with his diabolical run-out by wicket-keeper Mithun seemed to typify the theme of the match. He'd got Mithun's wicket too, the first, and at another point, as one newspaper reports, the entire Mumbai team had huddled to mouth an obscenity to the departing batsman Uthappa, retribution for the latter's employing ball-abuse, akin to racquet-abuse in tennis, that is, banging the ball into the ground to see off batsman Agarkar departing. Oh, but for the terror and tumult of hate to cease.... and life to be refashioned on anvils of peace! But neither team was in the mood for Wordsworth.
The Karnataka boys played like winners
Karnataka have to take heart from the fact that they didn't really lose this match because of the way they came back, but unfortunately there has to be one nominated winner.
Most relieved player (of the tournament): Ajinkya Rahane
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Karnataka build 4th-wicket stand to maintain outside chance
Day 3, Ranji Trophy final, Karnataka Vs Mumbai
By Vikram Afzulpurkar
Karnataka ended the day with their tails up by taking the last session of Day 3 with a stoic batting partnership. They're not out of the woods at 140 odd for 3, chasing 338 to edge out Mumbai for the title.
Hero Pandey
Manish Pandey has stroked a fluent half century, completely contrasting with any other individual innings in the match - almost a run a ball, striking many boundaries and chanceless. G Satish must equally be commended for the support - how else would it have been possible for Pandey to finish his backlift in a flourish and score boundaries with the gaps he found?
Brilliant Mumbai batting and spectacular Manish
Resuming at the overnight 108 for 5, a doughtily fought landmark from 50 for 5 by the Nayar-Kulkarni combine, the pair took their partnership to almost a hundred. Definitely a frustrating affair for the perservering Karnataka bowlers until Manish Pandey who was one of the many felons that had dropped half-chances until then took a catch that cannot get any better than this. There may be catches in the history or future of the game that will be great but will have to share the number 1 space with this one. Hence the expression "a catch as good as any" - As Nayar attempted to go aerial with spinner Sunil Joshi at long on, Pandey started to move towards the ball that was descending but well out of his reach and flinging his body at least ten feet in a dive, enabled wrist extension that helped him grab the chance cleanly. Grey-haired commentators and ex test cricketers immediately tried to compare it with catches in history, Milind Rege, former India player, talking about John Dyson making such a catch in the 80s and of course the name of Jonty Rhodes came up more than once. The talk on this catch will continue long after the match is over.
A micro-moment of cynicism against Mumbai
Depending on what kind of a cynic you are of Mumbai's strategy, you might say, this was a mini-turning point considering that Nayar had grafted so meticulously.... and to give it away with an aerial shot! But wait, his shot can be justified with many reasons: he was playing Joshi comfortably, he wanted to clear the close in fielders so that the batters could play for singles and twos more effectively, the new ball would be due in about 20 overs, and lastly that it was reasonably safe to hit it where he did (remember, Pandey 'created' the catch). So, only in the context that Karnataka are now looking much better at 140-odd for 3, and with you being a cynic of Mumbai's strategy can you say that the stroke was not justified.
Powar, Kulkarni build again
But anyhow, there was soon to be another frustrating stand put up by Kulkarni and Powar that added runs and made the Karnataka team looked ragged when Mumbai were 8-down. Kulkarni finally perished slashing at the new ball to be caught at gully and this time even cynics have to accept that with only two wickets in hand, the batsmen were justified in picking balls to score runs off.
Slower pitch
The Mumbai cynic then would be somebody who had read well into the pitch, expecting it to slow down on Day 3 and aid Karnataka in a chase, while all were going gaga that even 250 would be a very difficult total to chase, that too in the last innings and that too in a final. All justified in the context of how the pitch seamed on Day 1 and Day 2, but then there were probably a few connosieurs who were conjecturing Day- 3-onward pitch behaviour. It seems to be playing easier.
Karnataka cynics
Karnataka cynics will feel the lame dismissal of Robin Uthappa has robbed them of one of their top two batsmen - it was a regulation away-going ball outside off stump that Robin followed after he was committed to the stroke. Nothing very lame about that except that if you feel the pitch is slowing down, then Robin, or any other top batsman should have eschewed such chasing for the stakes now involved. About their other two dismissals, wild card Gautam who opened played a hard square cut in the first over by Agarkar to give a catch in the gully, while gritty Pawan was trapped in front by a sharp inswinger. Expect for Pandey's brilliant catching effort, Karnataka fans will feel many chances were dropped which would be determining factors in a final of this calibre. The stands of Kulkarni-Nayar and Kulkarni-Powar were so frustrating, one must feel that there must exist some solution in strategy or fielding that escaped them, so what if the Mumbaiites should dogged grit as they famously do.
Karnataka should compliment themselves and keep going
Three hundred and thirty eight is achievable by Karnataka on this possibly slowing pitch, considering their current position of 140-odd for 3 but it is a mountain. Manish Pandey shows no signs of slowing his scoring rate with the kind of bowling being dished out to him. It's possible the Mumbai bowlers are baiting him. Satish at the other end seems the ideal foil and is defending dourly as he should, while seizing the loose ball for runs. It's going to be interesting to see if there is a sudden character change in Pandey and he starts to graft, based on advice from his camp. At least Pandey and Satish have pulled the chance for victory out of the realms of the impossibility that it seemed to be heading towards after three wickets fell relatively early. Even if coasting to the score easily, the hosts must be wary of Mumbai's ability to pull a rabbit out of the hat.
By Vikram Afzulpurkar
Karnataka ended the day with their tails up by taking the last session of Day 3 with a stoic batting partnership. They're not out of the woods at 140 odd for 3, chasing 338 to edge out Mumbai for the title.
Hero Pandey
Manish Pandey has stroked a fluent half century, completely contrasting with any other individual innings in the match - almost a run a ball, striking many boundaries and chanceless. G Satish must equally be commended for the support - how else would it have been possible for Pandey to finish his backlift in a flourish and score boundaries with the gaps he found?
Brilliant Mumbai batting and spectacular Manish
Resuming at the overnight 108 for 5, a doughtily fought landmark from 50 for 5 by the Nayar-Kulkarni combine, the pair took their partnership to almost a hundred. Definitely a frustrating affair for the perservering Karnataka bowlers until Manish Pandey who was one of the many felons that had dropped half-chances until then took a catch that cannot get any better than this. There may be catches in the history or future of the game that will be great but will have to share the number 1 space with this one. Hence the expression "a catch as good as any" - As Nayar attempted to go aerial with spinner Sunil Joshi at long on, Pandey started to move towards the ball that was descending but well out of his reach and flinging his body at least ten feet in a dive, enabled wrist extension that helped him grab the chance cleanly. Grey-haired commentators and ex test cricketers immediately tried to compare it with catches in history, Milind Rege, former India player, talking about John Dyson making such a catch in the 80s and of course the name of Jonty Rhodes came up more than once. The talk on this catch will continue long after the match is over.
A micro-moment of cynicism against Mumbai
Depending on what kind of a cynic you are of Mumbai's strategy, you might say, this was a mini-turning point considering that Nayar had grafted so meticulously.... and to give it away with an aerial shot! But wait, his shot can be justified with many reasons: he was playing Joshi comfortably, he wanted to clear the close in fielders so that the batters could play for singles and twos more effectively, the new ball would be due in about 20 overs, and lastly that it was reasonably safe to hit it where he did (remember, Pandey 'created' the catch). So, only in the context that Karnataka are now looking much better at 140-odd for 3, and with you being a cynic of Mumbai's strategy can you say that the stroke was not justified.
Powar, Kulkarni build again
But anyhow, there was soon to be another frustrating stand put up by Kulkarni and Powar that added runs and made the Karnataka team looked ragged when Mumbai were 8-down. Kulkarni finally perished slashing at the new ball to be caught at gully and this time even cynics have to accept that with only two wickets in hand, the batsmen were justified in picking balls to score runs off.
Slower pitch
The Mumbai cynic then would be somebody who had read well into the pitch, expecting it to slow down on Day 3 and aid Karnataka in a chase, while all were going gaga that even 250 would be a very difficult total to chase, that too in the last innings and that too in a final. All justified in the context of how the pitch seamed on Day 1 and Day 2, but then there were probably a few connosieurs who were conjecturing Day- 3-onward pitch behaviour. It seems to be playing easier.
Karnataka cynics
Karnataka cynics will feel the lame dismissal of Robin Uthappa has robbed them of one of their top two batsmen - it was a regulation away-going ball outside off stump that Robin followed after he was committed to the stroke. Nothing very lame about that except that if you feel the pitch is slowing down, then Robin, or any other top batsman should have eschewed such chasing for the stakes now involved. About their other two dismissals, wild card Gautam who opened played a hard square cut in the first over by Agarkar to give a catch in the gully, while gritty Pawan was trapped in front by a sharp inswinger. Expect for Pandey's brilliant catching effort, Karnataka fans will feel many chances were dropped which would be determining factors in a final of this calibre. The stands of Kulkarni-Nayar and Kulkarni-Powar were so frustrating, one must feel that there must exist some solution in strategy or fielding that escaped them, so what if the Mumbaiites should dogged grit as they famously do.
Karnataka should compliment themselves and keep going
Three hundred and thirty eight is achievable by Karnataka on this possibly slowing pitch, considering their current position of 140-odd for 3 but it is a mountain. Manish Pandey shows no signs of slowing his scoring rate with the kind of bowling being dished out to him. It's possible the Mumbai bowlers are baiting him. Satish at the other end seems the ideal foil and is defending dourly as he should, while seizing the loose ball for runs. It's going to be interesting to see if there is a sudden character change in Pandey and he starts to graft, based on advice from his camp. At least Pandey and Satish have pulled the chance for victory out of the realms of the impossibility that it seemed to be heading towards after three wickets fell relatively early. Even if coasting to the score easily, the hosts must be wary of Mumbai's ability to pull a rabbit out of the hat.
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
The Dhawal-Ashishek Wall
Day 2, Ranji Trophy final 2009-10, Karnataka Vs Mumbai, at Mysore
By Vikram Afzulpurkar
See-sawing fortunes for both teams, not surprisingly on a lively bowling pitch, characterized the day at the picturesque Gangotri Glades ground in Mysore. Mumbai ended the day at a comfortable 108 for 5, after being 50-odd for the same number of wickets, therefore taking their overall lead to 215, after bowling out Karnataka for 130 just after lunch. The Jai-Veeru batting combination of Dhawal Kulkarni and Abhishek Nayar took highest honours.
Mithun slices the Mumbai spleen
The end situation on Day 2 does not tell the sorry tale the visitors’ top order described, again collapsing to 18 for 3, with the stoic Mithun striking with deceptive swing while pitching just outside off stump. Two more wickets fell amidst a mild stability, taking them to just over 50 runs before Dhawal Kulkarni walked in and put up possibly the most crucial stand in the match so far, with the solid Abhishek Nayar.
Mumbai had their moments early in the day also
Earlier in the day, Mumbai had reason to be excited, dismissing their rivals for 130 and gaining what on this wicket can be described as a huge 103 run first-innings lead. Salvi’s jubilation at the fall of the last wicket was probably the only time the body language showed the relief of securing the first innings lead, but everybody had resigned themselves to the fact that this would be a match decided on outright result.
The Karnataka dilemna
Karnataka have a worrying situation on their hands unless they scheme well overnight to plot the downfall of the current Kulkarni-Nayar partnership and ensure they continue the trend for the next four wickets. They must be wondering how they allowed a non-batsman like Kulkarni to settle into a 90-minute crease occupation especially when wickets were tumbling at their will? But of course, it’s easy to be a couch potato. They tried their best. The Mumbai duo just got stuck in there. Of course, if they clean them up and the rest of the batters early, it’ll still require great batting from Karnataka to reach their 250+ target.
Karnataka’s optimistic approach tomorrow
To take a realistic view, Mumbai would probably be able to add 50 more runs in session 1 on Day 3 tomorrow. Now, how would the pitch play post lunch Day 3? Possibly slower, therefore allowing Karnataka the best batting surface across both sides because they would bat into Day 4 as well, again with the pitch not developing spin devils, something possibly expected on Day 5. Possibly, but not necessarily.
Deviation check
In all of this Karnataka will be well aware of the batting might of the defending champions and the possibility of them batting up to tea on Day 3 and adding yet another fifty.
Get the Mumbaiites for 50 more and chase well
So, it would seem that for Karnataka to get the Mumbaiites all out by lunch and for a maximum of 50 runs would be a good target. Any earlier and for any lesser runs is even better! And a possibility of the hosts batting on a slowing surface. Oh, for Dravid (who’s missing this match because of a schedule mismatch with national committments)! But then that evens it up, or Mumbai’ll be crying hoarse for Sachin.
Let’s see how tomorrow unfolds.
By Vikram Afzulpurkar
See-sawing fortunes for both teams, not surprisingly on a lively bowling pitch, characterized the day at the picturesque Gangotri Glades ground in Mysore. Mumbai ended the day at a comfortable 108 for 5, after being 50-odd for the same number of wickets, therefore taking their overall lead to 215, after bowling out Karnataka for 130 just after lunch. The Jai-Veeru batting combination of Dhawal Kulkarni and Abhishek Nayar took highest honours.
Mithun slices the Mumbai spleen
The end situation on Day 2 does not tell the sorry tale the visitors’ top order described, again collapsing to 18 for 3, with the stoic Mithun striking with deceptive swing while pitching just outside off stump. Two more wickets fell amidst a mild stability, taking them to just over 50 runs before Dhawal Kulkarni walked in and put up possibly the most crucial stand in the match so far, with the solid Abhishek Nayar.
Mumbai had their moments early in the day also
Earlier in the day, Mumbai had reason to be excited, dismissing their rivals for 130 and gaining what on this wicket can be described as a huge 103 run first-innings lead. Salvi’s jubilation at the fall of the last wicket was probably the only time the body language showed the relief of securing the first innings lead, but everybody had resigned themselves to the fact that this would be a match decided on outright result.
The Karnataka dilemna
Karnataka have a worrying situation on their hands unless they scheme well overnight to plot the downfall of the current Kulkarni-Nayar partnership and ensure they continue the trend for the next four wickets. They must be wondering how they allowed a non-batsman like Kulkarni to settle into a 90-minute crease occupation especially when wickets were tumbling at their will? But of course, it’s easy to be a couch potato. They tried their best. The Mumbai duo just got stuck in there. Of course, if they clean them up and the rest of the batters early, it’ll still require great batting from Karnataka to reach their 250+ target.
Karnataka’s optimistic approach tomorrow
To take a realistic view, Mumbai would probably be able to add 50 more runs in session 1 on Day 3 tomorrow. Now, how would the pitch play post lunch Day 3? Possibly slower, therefore allowing Karnataka the best batting surface across both sides because they would bat into Day 4 as well, again with the pitch not developing spin devils, something possibly expected on Day 5. Possibly, but not necessarily.
Deviation check
In all of this Karnataka will be well aware of the batting might of the defending champions and the possibility of them batting up to tea on Day 3 and adding yet another fifty.
Get the Mumbaiites for 50 more and chase well
So, it would seem that for Karnataka to get the Mumbaiites all out by lunch and for a maximum of 50 runs would be a good target. Any earlier and for any lesser runs is even better! And a possibility of the hosts batting on a slowing surface. Oh, for Dravid (who’s missing this match because of a schedule mismatch with national committments)! But then that evens it up, or Mumbai’ll be crying hoarse for Sachin.
Let’s see how tomorrow unfolds.
Monday, January 11, 2010
Bowling wins
Day 1, Ranji Trophy 2009-10 final, Karnataka vs Mumbai, Mysore
By Vikram Afzulpurkar
Full marks to Karnataka for being dynamic with their host venue option and choosing Mysore’s Gangotri Glades ground because of the green wicket. Their pacers had pegged out the first three Mumbai batters within the first half hour to leave the hosts at 21 for 3.
No fault of the Mumbai top order
While the credit for hurling the ball in the right area goes to the Karnataka fast bowlers, which yielded the first three wickets, neither of the Mumbai batsmen, Sahil Kukreja, Wasim Jaffer, nor Ajinkya Rahane played injudicious strokes in their dismissals. The grassy wicket's movement and bounce made the ball find the edges of Kukreja and Rahane in what you might call regulation caught-behind dismissals. Jaffer played a shot that anybody in his right mind would do – flick a fast bowler off his hips – but unluckily to give a catch to the forward-short-leg fielder, purely a reflex catch that stuck after some minor juggling. Pacer Vinay Kumar, with his model action, accounted for these three.
Mithun to the fore again
Innovative bowling should win tournaments. The romantic of mind probably remember Pakistan’s World Cup triumph in 1992 and Aquib Javed clean bowling Greatbatch with what turned out to be a finger-spun leg-spinner to the left hander, and then Wasim Akram castling Lamb and Chris Lewis in the final with late reverse swinging balls. It required as much ability as guts in the pressure situations to innovate. Similarly, Indians remember Balwinder Sandhu’s World Cup 1983 final’s ball to Greenidge which famously shattered his stumps while he intended a glorious 'leave.' Did the much touted A Mithun, Karnataka’s find-of-the-season pacer, do the same today? His wickets of two top-class Mumbai left-handers Omkar Khanvilkar and Abhishek Nayar yorked the batsman and probably opened the floodgates.
Mithun read the batsmen well
While Mumbai batted until that point, it seemed that bowling the right length to the batsman would be the theme. After all it was a green wicket that had vindicated itself by at least two dismissals upto that point because of the swing and bounce factor. Planning the executioner's ball, Mithun who was by now really bending his back sent down two old-fashioned yorkers, maybe with a hint of swing in them.
Day of the yorker
A question - Has the yorker otherwise lost its prominence in day to day cricket and instead being replaced with hundreds of variations of a slow ball, the knuckle ball, the across-the-seam grip ball? Are yorkers mostly favoured only when reverse swing is possible with the older ball? Mithun changed the tempo as he actually thought out of the box.
Wicket keeper’s controversy
Well, right from Rod Marsh behind the stumps asking batsman Ian Botham “So, how’s your wife and my kids” to being the vocal therapists of every ball, wicket keepers open up a pandora’s box on the spirit of the game. Today, the Karnataka wicketkeeper chose a quieter route to controversy by apparently running out Agarkar when the batsman safely believed it was a dead ball and for a moment had his feet outside the popping crease when shadow-practising a stroke. Considering that the umpires deliberated over the decision before giving it, therefore expending some time, there seemed to be no effort from Karnataka to recall the appeal. Mumbai will be fuming with this one, but the game goes on. Well, this is now a game that allows the non-striker to back up as much as he wants to while the bowler can do nothing to run him out at his end. So, wont' batting sides that are wronged question the spirit of the game and why the fielding side or even the law not supporting a striker injudicious action.
Jaffer’s life-learning
Vinayak Samant, probably the last of the genuine bastmen, did an admirable job with his 60-odd runs, also displaying the instinct of protecting number 11 batsman Salvi by selective running of singles which would bring the latter on strike. Mumbai will definitely feel proud of their lower order taking them to 233 when earlier in the day 6 wickets had fallen for 106 runs only. Perhaps Wasim Jaffer’s takeaway so far will be to trust the nature of the wicket and deviate from the famous bat-first philosophy, which he adhered to in the morning when he won the toss. He must’ve been thinking that if the last 4 wickets could raise 117 runs, wouldn’t the top 6 have given at least a hundred more to add to the 233? What’s the best way to decide? Take strong local opinion instead of reading the hosts’ newly laid pitch yourself? But then again, had he lost the toss, he would have had to take first strike.
Expect the unexpected
Even though Mumbai is historically a 'batting side,' Karnataka will not take the former's bowling and teamwork lightly on a crucial second day. Mumbai have famously pegged back oppositions in the past, whether with a stack of wickets, runs or catches especially with the chips down.
Match lasting five days?
Maybe too much emphasis is being laid by all –players, coaches, commentators and spectators - on the first innings lead. On this proven greentop, would a game last five days? The cynic feels that even with a speculative first innings score from Karnataka of about 350 by lunch on the third day, giving them the first innings lead, at what rate Mumbai scores its runs in the second innings will tell us if the game is going to head to an outright finish by two innings. If Mumbai's famed batting tank hits up an ambitious 450 in a day and a half, can their bowlers defend a target of, say 325, by bowling out Karnataka in one full day's play, that is, on the final day? But this is mere speculation.
Can Karnataka do a dour defending act in the first innings?
It may be unlikely that Karnataka consume two full days in stretching out their first innings lead, which as an outcome would place them as favourites for winning on the first innings basis. The reason for this is that ultra defensiveness will cause them to lose wickets. With attacking fields set by the Mumbaiites, the Karnataka batters will have to play attacking strokes or hit over the top, therefore increasing the chances for Mumbai to get wickets, which simultaneously enabling Karnataka to get quick runs.
By Vikram Afzulpurkar
Full marks to Karnataka for being dynamic with their host venue option and choosing Mysore’s Gangotri Glades ground because of the green wicket. Their pacers had pegged out the first three Mumbai batters within the first half hour to leave the hosts at 21 for 3.
No fault of the Mumbai top order
While the credit for hurling the ball in the right area goes to the Karnataka fast bowlers, which yielded the first three wickets, neither of the Mumbai batsmen, Sahil Kukreja, Wasim Jaffer, nor Ajinkya Rahane played injudicious strokes in their dismissals. The grassy wicket's movement and bounce made the ball find the edges of Kukreja and Rahane in what you might call regulation caught-behind dismissals. Jaffer played a shot that anybody in his right mind would do – flick a fast bowler off his hips – but unluckily to give a catch to the forward-short-leg fielder, purely a reflex catch that stuck after some minor juggling. Pacer Vinay Kumar, with his model action, accounted for these three.
Mithun to the fore again
Innovative bowling should win tournaments. The romantic of mind probably remember Pakistan’s World Cup triumph in 1992 and Aquib Javed clean bowling Greatbatch with what turned out to be a finger-spun leg-spinner to the left hander, and then Wasim Akram castling Lamb and Chris Lewis in the final with late reverse swinging balls. It required as much ability as guts in the pressure situations to innovate. Similarly, Indians remember Balwinder Sandhu’s World Cup 1983 final’s ball to Greenidge which famously shattered his stumps while he intended a glorious 'leave.' Did the much touted A Mithun, Karnataka’s find-of-the-season pacer, do the same today? His wickets of two top-class Mumbai left-handers Omkar Khanvilkar and Abhishek Nayar yorked the batsman and probably opened the floodgates.
Mithun read the batsmen well
While Mumbai batted until that point, it seemed that bowling the right length to the batsman would be the theme. After all it was a green wicket that had vindicated itself by at least two dismissals upto that point because of the swing and bounce factor. Planning the executioner's ball, Mithun who was by now really bending his back sent down two old-fashioned yorkers, maybe with a hint of swing in them.
Day of the yorker
A question - Has the yorker otherwise lost its prominence in day to day cricket and instead being replaced with hundreds of variations of a slow ball, the knuckle ball, the across-the-seam grip ball? Are yorkers mostly favoured only when reverse swing is possible with the older ball? Mithun changed the tempo as he actually thought out of the box.
Wicket keeper’s controversy
Well, right from Rod Marsh behind the stumps asking batsman Ian Botham “So, how’s your wife and my kids” to being the vocal therapists of every ball, wicket keepers open up a pandora’s box on the spirit of the game. Today, the Karnataka wicketkeeper chose a quieter route to controversy by apparently running out Agarkar when the batsman safely believed it was a dead ball and for a moment had his feet outside the popping crease when shadow-practising a stroke. Considering that the umpires deliberated over the decision before giving it, therefore expending some time, there seemed to be no effort from Karnataka to recall the appeal. Mumbai will be fuming with this one, but the game goes on. Well, this is now a game that allows the non-striker to back up as much as he wants to while the bowler can do nothing to run him out at his end. So, wont' batting sides that are wronged question the spirit of the game and why the fielding side or even the law not supporting a striker injudicious action.
Jaffer’s life-learning
Vinayak Samant, probably the last of the genuine bastmen, did an admirable job with his 60-odd runs, also displaying the instinct of protecting number 11 batsman Salvi by selective running of singles which would bring the latter on strike. Mumbai will definitely feel proud of their lower order taking them to 233 when earlier in the day 6 wickets had fallen for 106 runs only. Perhaps Wasim Jaffer’s takeaway so far will be to trust the nature of the wicket and deviate from the famous bat-first philosophy, which he adhered to in the morning when he won the toss. He must’ve been thinking that if the last 4 wickets could raise 117 runs, wouldn’t the top 6 have given at least a hundred more to add to the 233? What’s the best way to decide? Take strong local opinion instead of reading the hosts’ newly laid pitch yourself? But then again, had he lost the toss, he would have had to take first strike.
Expect the unexpected
Even though Mumbai is historically a 'batting side,' Karnataka will not take the former's bowling and teamwork lightly on a crucial second day. Mumbai have famously pegged back oppositions in the past, whether with a stack of wickets, runs or catches especially with the chips down.
Match lasting five days?
Maybe too much emphasis is being laid by all –players, coaches, commentators and spectators - on the first innings lead. On this proven greentop, would a game last five days? The cynic feels that even with a speculative first innings score from Karnataka of about 350 by lunch on the third day, giving them the first innings lead, at what rate Mumbai scores its runs in the second innings will tell us if the game is going to head to an outright finish by two innings. If Mumbai's famed batting tank hits up an ambitious 450 in a day and a half, can their bowlers defend a target of, say 325, by bowling out Karnataka in one full day's play, that is, on the final day? But this is mere speculation.
Can Karnataka do a dour defending act in the first innings?
It may be unlikely that Karnataka consume two full days in stretching out their first innings lead, which as an outcome would place them as favourites for winning on the first innings basis. The reason for this is that ultra defensiveness will cause them to lose wickets. With attacking fields set by the Mumbaiites, the Karnataka batters will have to play attacking strokes or hit over the top, therefore increasing the chances for Mumbai to get wickets, which simultaneously enabling Karnataka to get quick runs.
Sunday, November 15, 2009
ODI Series and Bilateral series a dead concept
By Vikram Afzulpurkar
You'd have to say these days that cricket series of one-day internationals represent 'dead rubber.' Of course, Test cricket is not considered part of this comparison and retains its place in the annals of the game. So, driving public demand are tournaments and leagues instead.
Maybe that's the future of cricket. And why not if TRPs , read - accurate readings of the television audience at a given moment, demand a peek into that conscience?
'Public interest' back 1912
So, public interest may be causing the most popular form of cricket, unarguably between ODI and Twenty20, to veer away to a many splendoured form, with many teams involved at the same time. However, history will peculiarly reveal that it was public interest that caused the demise of the first attempt of a tournament, back in 1912 when England, Australia and South Africa played each other in Tests.
Cricket authorities decided that henceforth they would play more series, but perhaps fine tuning that to say it'd be bilateral series, to balance it out in the end - the logic being that once a series concluded, with the obvious assumption that the host team would have had some home advantage, a return series as soon as feasible in the cricket calendar, where the visitors would now become the hosts, would even it out for both the teams.
Well, coming back to the public interest failure of cricket's first tournament that was a failure in 1912, England, Australia and South Africa played each other. The failure of the tournament did not seem surprising because only 12 years prior, the Olympic Committee felt cricket's inclusion in the 1900 Olympics was as a failure and cancelled the sport from the august Games? Or maybe they weren't impressed that Great Britain beat only France by 158 - akin to the joke in the commentary box when Botham analysed all the fast bowlers' highest batting scores and asked Michael Holding if his "58 was against Iceland in the World Cup Qualifiers!"
Public Interest Again Post 2000 CE
Funnily it is 'public interest' that is initiating a shyly unstated preference for a tournament (the World Cup, Champions Trophy, tri-series) or a league (IPL). Simply, the pundits will analyze if the TV audience is that much more for a tournament vis a vis a regular of one-day internationals and presume that they can have a better revenue sharing model for all. So, will we soon see a day that series (one-day internationals) will rarely take place? Where will be the time in the calendar to accommodate them, even if they're relegated to practice matches where youngsters can be groomed?
Test Cricket Still Genuine for the Cricketers
Test cricket will stay clear of this path-breaking change. A test series was tried out over a decade go, although at different national venues, but was not considered a great success. Moreover, the opinions of all top cricketers has consistently been that Test cricket is real cricket, so it will stay not out of sheer tradition but out of a genuine need of the practitioners.
Friday, November 6, 2009
Rocket launcher Raina fails in more ways than one
Our penchant for records and heros in India will do us in and the culprits of a lost cricket match will get away because they have played to supposed potential, and with the comforting thought that the roll of the die merely meant Indian could not scamper home to victory in the fifth ODI against Australia yesterday.
Too much ebullence
I switched off the TV after Suresh Raina got out, but that was because an early night was badly needed and also the conviction that my prediction would come true - About an over or two before the UP-left-hander's dismissal he launched into a big six, thus making the statement that he can match the ebullient veteran Sachin Tendulkar's strokes. Many wizened men in cricket would have also thought that if the ball was there to be hit, might as well have boundaries and sixes from both ends, than from Tendulkar alone, who had taken centre stage in at least the 10 overs before that.
The quiet death knell
I differed. Raina had looked not his technical-best in recent matches, but leave that aside. He seemed to miss too often when attempting big shots, than the master Tendulkar on the day seemed to have done. It seemed inevitable that the left-hander would fall soon, but worse still the scenario would emerge that the run-a-ball required equation would get difficult because a wicket having fallen would mean the run rate would slow down and undoubtedly, Tendulkar would not be launching into sixes as he so effortlessly had been to the spinners up and until that point. He would then need to play out some balls to 'pick up' that rhythm again, in the company of Harbhajan, or whoever was to follow, therefore making the task difficult for India who would be 5 wickets down at the stage. From there, India would either lose the match or make things difficult from a point of relative ease.
The Vertical Rocket
And so, it was. Suresh Raina soon launched into a rocket, but not one that soared out of the stadium. Instead it was a vertical one that was safely pouched by an Australian fielder. And then the end came to the Indian chase, which I didn't witness.
Heros and Gods
Trouble is that Raina thought he'd done his job of 60 odd runs in a lesser number of balls and his place would be safe. Also, our Indian fans would look back and say he didn't do anything wrong but contributed handsome runs but perished when trying with his partner Tendulkar to keep the required run run rate down to what it was.
Judge them differently
This is the problem with complacency. We must now judge our stars not for their records and their less-than a ball contribution for each run, we must judge them from how they perform in pressure situations and whether they throw away wickets and matches from wanting to gloriously finish off things.
To me, what's important in a chase is not the guy hitting the odd sixes and boundaries (that was Tendulkar) but the other one, who's rotating the strike with singles. The bowling side actually loses rythm when they see that one batter is not out to hit them out of the ground. Why do you think Ponting had his spinners on? To buy wickets for runs and attempted ground-clearing strokes. When both batsmen are hitting, the bowling side feel they have a chance, and actually slip into a rythm. But when one batter is eschewing belligerence, their line and length is not in control, moreover they are in a brain fog.
Suresh Raina lost a good chance to prove he can actually be a good finisher. His running between the wickets seemed also to defy commonsense principles of whose call it is and taking a start. He looked quite out of sorts. He doesn't look like India's find for the future. It's all in the temperament.
Of course, hats off to Tendulkar for a great knock. These knocks must be justified with commonsense thinking from his teammates.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)